Legal Opinion

Hamlin v. Austin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1980No. 8028DC182PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Plaintiffs’ assignments of error, their exceptions, and their arguments in their brief, all relate to alleged errors in the judgment of the trial court entered 10 October 1979. This appeal, however, was taken from the trial court’s order entered 5 November 1979 denying plaintiffs’ motion to amend the judgment pursuant to N.C. Rules Civ. P. 59(e), G.S. 1A-1. A motion under Rule 59(a) is “addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge, whose ruling, in the absence of abuse of discretion, is not reviewable on appeal. Glen Forest Corp. v. Bensch, 9 N.C. App. 587, 176 S.E. 2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. GLEN FOREST CORPORATION v. BenschCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. In Re BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ncatr v. NcdotCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. North Carolina Alliance for Transportation Reform, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Young v. LicaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Strickland v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Horne v. TrivetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API