Legal Opinion

Horne v. Trivette

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 6, 1982No. 8121SC1023PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Defendants argue that the court erred in denying their motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the issues of defendant Martha Trivette’s negligence and Horne’s contributory negligence. They contend that the evidence did not show any actionable negligence by defendant which prox imately caused Horne’s death, and that Horne’s failure to keep a proper lookout caused the accident. The question presented by a defendant’s motion for a directed verdict is whether the evidence, taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff, is sufficient for submission…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Barney v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Rodgers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. State v. BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Grimm v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kinsey v. SpannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Ferguson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Watts v. Schult Homes Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Ayscue v. WeldonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Potts v. Kel, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API