Legal Opinion

Styers v. Stirrat & Goetz Investment Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1911No. 9791PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J’., entered June 9, 1911, in favor of the defendant, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

— The plaintiff commenced this action in the superior court for King county, to foreclose a lien claimed by him for labor performed in the construction of the Northern Bank and Trust building in Seattle. A trial upon the *677merits resulted in the denial of foreclosure and dismissal of the action. From this disposition of the cause, the plaintiff has appealed.

The controlling facts are not in dispute. On October 11, 1909, A. A. Gordon and F. W. White, copartners as Gordon, White & Company, entered into a contract with respondent by which they agreed to erect a certain portion of the structural…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cothran v. Marmaduke & BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Buford v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. Thillman v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  4. Belch v. Big Store Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Cudahy Packing Co. v. HibouMississippi Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stipcich v. MarinovichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State v. Walla Walla Fruit Growers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Stoner v. ShultzWashington Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API