Legal Opinion

People v. Hawkins

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided April 21, 1942No. Crim. A. No. 1864PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

A pedestrian who finds himself on his way across a street when the traffic signal changes from “Go” to “Stop” may be impelled by his common sense to retrace his steps to the safety of the nearest curb, but he is not compelled by the law to do so; by continuing on his journey to the opposite curb he may be guilty of negligence, but not of a crime.

The charge upon which the defendant was convicted was that he “being a pedestrian crossing the roadway of Hill Street... at an intersection where traffic was then and there controlled by a traffic control signal device and by police officers, did…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Department of Motor Vehicles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Croxall v. Broadway Department Store, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Brockway v. Western Union Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Myhre v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. HahnAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1950
  3. Newell v. National Bank of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. HahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API