New York Central Development Corp. v. Byczynski
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtScheineman, J.
The plaintiffs obtained an option to buy 370 acres of land from defendants at a fixed price of $330,000. The contract contained this provision:
“The conveyance of the above premises is conditioned upon conveyance of suitable exchange property to seller. Seller will sell only if such exchange property cannot be acquired by purchaser.”
When the buyers exercised their option as provided in the contract, the sellers declined to close the deal. Plaintiffs then filed this suit in equity praying for specific performance. It was defended on the ground that plaintiffs had not performed their obligation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pocius v. HalvorsenIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
- Fuchs & Lang Manufacturing Co. v. R. J. Kittredge & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Olson v. RossetterIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
- Abingdon Bank & Trust Co. v. BulkeleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Consolidated Coal Co. v. SchneiderIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kinesoft Development Corp. v. Softbank Holdings Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Real Estate Data, Inc. v. The Sidwell Co., and Sidwell Studio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Federal Deposit Insurance, Corp. v. FBOP Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Orput-Orput & Associates, Inc. v. McCarthyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.