Legal Opinion

Nederlandsche Handel-Maatschappij, N v. v. Sentry Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 24, 1958No. Civ. A. 24280, 24281PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EGAN, District Judge.

These two actions arise out of the same situation and will be disposed of at one time. Originally begun in the state courts, they were removed here on motion of the defendant because of the diversity of citizenship that exists.

The plaintiff, Netherlands Trading Society, a commercial banking house, is a Dutch corporation having its principal place of business in this country, in New York City. Defendant, Sentry Corporation, is a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business in Philadelphia. It is a holding company owning outright the stock of four subsidiary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mindlin v. Saxony Spinning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Falk & Co. v. South Texas Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Brendle v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  4. Atkins v. Canadian Skf Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Sentry Corporation v. Conal International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Inter-Regional Financial Group, Inc. v. Cyrus HashemiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. Chadwin v. KrouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Lantz International Corp. v. Industria Termotecnica Campana, S.P.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Siy v. McMickingNew York Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API