Legal Opinion

Brendle v. Smith

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 26, 1942PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIFKIND, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendants to stay all proceedings in this suit until a final determination of a suit pending in the New York Supreme Court.

This suit (hereinafter called the Brendle suit), like the one pending in the state court (hereinafter called the Consolidated Action),' is a stockholder’s derivative action for the benefit of United States Rubber Company. The procedural events preceding the making of the pending motion have become characteristic of such actions. Since they constitute the normal life history of the stockholder’s derivative action it is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Atlas Life Insurance v. W. I. Southern, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Mechanics Universal Joint Co. v. CulhaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mottolese v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. Rosenfeld v. Schwitzer CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  3. Dederick v. North American Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  4. Slade v. DickinsonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1949
  5. Kamen Soap Products Co. v. STRUTHERS WELLS CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API