Turley v. Incorporated Town of Dyersville
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.
-Both parties to this action appeal. ' The landowner is designated as the appellant; and the municipality as the appellee. At the outset, we deem it not improper to note that we are confronted by an abstract of 141 pages, an amended abstract of 74 pages, an exhibit consisting of a typewritten transcript of 120 pages, one brief of 120 pages, another of 94 pages, and a third of 19 pages; and in said briefs there is a grand total of 233 citations for our consideration. Accompanying these are numerous charts, plats, photo graphs, and other exhibits. This voluminous, formidable, and unnecessarily…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nixon v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Manning v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Curtis v. Town of DunlapSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Wigodsky v. Town of HolsteinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Cardell v. City of PerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rood v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
- Gingles v. City of OnawaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Illinois Power & Light Corp. v. City of Centralia, Ill.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1935
- Finkle v. City of MarshalltownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928