Legal Opinion

Wigodsky v. Town of Holstein

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 6, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Gbapp, J.

On August 7, 1922, the town council of the incorporated town of Holstein adopted a proposed resolution of necessity for the paving of certain of its streets and alleys. Different types and methods of paving were proposed, as follows:

“First. Concrete pavement 6 inches thick.
“Concrete pavement 7 inches thick.
“Second. Asphaltic concrete pavement, 2-inch wearing surface upon a 5-inch concrete base.
“Third. Warrenite bitulithic pavement, 2-inch wearing surface upon a 5-ineh concrete base.”

*912*911The notice to property owners of the proposed resolution of necessity described the types and method of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nixon v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Miller v. City of OelweinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. In re Appeal of AppleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Atkinson v. City of Webster CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Benshoof v. City of Iowa FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Master Builders of Iowa, Inc. v. Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. Lametti & Sons, Inc. v. City of Davenport, IowaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1977
  3. Turley v. Incorporated Town of DyersvilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Cardell v. City of PerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  5. Master Builders of Iowa, Inc. v. Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API