Legal Opinion
Wigodsky v. Town of Holstein
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided April 6, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Gbapp, J.
On August 7, 1922, the town council of the incorporated town of Holstein adopted a proposed resolution of necessity for the paving of certain of its streets and alleys. Different types and methods of paving were proposed, as follows:
“First. Concrete pavement 6 inches thick.
“Concrete pavement 7 inches thick.
“Second. Asphaltic concrete pavement, 2-inch wearing surface upon a 5-inch concrete base.
“Third. Warrenite bitulithic pavement, 2-inch wearing surface upon a 5-ineh concrete base.”
*912*911The notice to property owners of the proposed resolution of necessity described the types and method of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nixon v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Miller v. City of OelweinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- In re Appeal of AppleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Atkinson v. City of Webster CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Benshoof v. City of Iowa FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Master Builders of Iowa, Inc. v. Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Lametti & Sons, Inc. v. City of Davenport, IowaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1977
- Turley v. Incorporated Town of DyersvilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Cardell v. City of PerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Master Builders of Iowa, Inc. v. Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2002