Legal Opinion

City of Buffalo Urban Renewal Agency v. Lane Bryant Queens, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 9, 1982PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and judgment entered declaring the rights of the parties, in accordance with the following memorandum: The City of Buffalo Urban Renewal Agency (Urban Renewal) commenced this action seeking declaratory judgment that a certain document entitled “Notice of Displacement” dated May 12, 1980, served on Lane Bryant was sufficient notice to terminate the parties’ lease. The lease contained a condemnation clause which provided that in the event one third or more of the demised premises was taken for public use by right of eminent domain, or private…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chinatown Apartments, Inc. v. Chu Cho LamNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Granet Construction Corp. v. LongoNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  4. 28 Mott Street Co. v. Summit Import Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1970
  5. Cooney Bros. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ellivkroy Realty Corp. v. HDP 86 Sponsor Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Fairview Co. v. IdowuCivil Court of the City of New York · 1990
  3. SAAB Enterprises, Inc. v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Authentic Hansom Cabs, Ltd. v. Nisselson (In re Fayolle)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  5. Lehtonen v. DellaquilaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API