Legal Opinion
28 Mott Street Co. v. Summit Import Corp.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided November 6, 1970PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen Murray Myers, J.
In a previous summary dispossess holdover proceeding petitioner (landlord) sought to remove the respondent (tenant) from the premises upon the ground that the respondent’s month-to-month tenancy had been terminated on December 1, 1968 pursuant to a 30-day notice as required by section 232-a of the Real Property Law. In that action this court rejected petitioner’s contention of a tenancy from month to month, and found instead a tenancy from year to year, which could be terminated on any annual expiration date, August 31, upon six months’ prior notice, and held the 30-day notice insufficient…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adams v. . City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Pugsley v. . AikinNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Morgan v. PowersNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Boland v. BeebeCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
- Hedden v. NederburgAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Andrus v. DunbarSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Zenila Realty Corp. v. MasterandreaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- City of Buffalo Urban Renewal Agency v. Lane Bryant Queens, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Kirschenbaum v. M-T-S Franchise Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1974
- Adina 74 Realty Corp. v. HudsonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.