Legal Opinion

Bohart v. Mathews

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 11, 1911No. 955PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error from Grady County Court; N. M. Williams, Judge. Action by W. A. Bohart against Augustus F. Mathews. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This proceeding in error is to review a judgment in the lower court wherein the plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, sued the defendant in error, as defendant, upon two promissory notes made and delivered by the defendant to plaintiff. Answer was filed admitting the execution of the notes, but averring fraud and misrepresentation in obtaining same. A reply was filed thereto and a trial had before the court without the intervention of a jury. A general finding was made in favor of the defendant and judgment rendered thereon.

The plaintiff in error insists that he was entitled (1) to judgment on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCann v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Alcorn v. DennisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Kaufman v. BoismierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Cobb v. Wm. Kenefick Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Bretch Bros. v. S. Winston & SonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. LenahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Elwood Oil & Gas Co. v. GanoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Shawnee Life Ins. Co. v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. City of Tulsa v. GrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Hilsmeyer v. BlakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API