Legal Opinion

Bell v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 14, 1960PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

These are two motions by plaintiff, as president of Locals 1804 and 1804-1 International Longshoremen’s Association (AFL-CIO) and in behalf of their members, for orders vacating two subpoenas duces tecum issued by the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, hereinafter Waterfront Commission. The two subpoenas are identical except that one is addressed to plaintiff as president of Local 1804 and the other to him as president of Local 1804-1. The motions originated as two independent proceedings but, when the objection was made by the Waterfront Commission that the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Harrison v. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored PeopleSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. HoffaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1965
  2. Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  3. Volk v. ZlotoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  4. Morrissey v. CurranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  5. Haine v. GoogeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API