Legal Opinion

Volk v. Zlotoff

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 13, 1968No. 67 Civ. 4076PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HERLANDS, District Judge:

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment presents a novel and important question under the “short-swing” profits provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: whether a mutual rescission of the exercise of a stock purchase option may immunize a transaction against liability under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b). 1 We hold that it does not.

Plaintiff, a shareholder of Yoo-Hoo Chocolate Beverage Corporation (hereafter Yoo-Hoo), commenced this action on October 19, 1967 to recover “short-swing” profits from three…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Smolowe v. Delendo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  4. Gratz v. ClaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  5. Park & Tilford, Inc. v. SchulteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Tyco Laboratories, Inc. v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  2. Morales v. Gould Investors TrustDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  3. Oliff v. Exchange International Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
  4. Rosen v. DrislerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  5. Rosenberg v. XO Communications, Inc. (In Re XO Communications, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API