Legal Opinion
Morrissey v. Curran
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 23, 1969No. 69 Civ. 442PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BONSAL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are three members of the National Maritime Union of America (NMU); defendants Curran and Wall are elected officers of the NMU; defendant Perry was an employee of the NMU and Assistant to the President; and defendants Segal, Freedman, and Karchftier are trustees of the NMU Officers’ Pension Plan (the Pension Plan).
Plaintiffs instituted this action in February 1969. The complaint alleges that defendants allowed the Pension Plan to be amended in 1961, so as to include as participants designated employees of the NMU, who were not elected officers of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Charles E. Williams v. Howard Johnson's Inc. Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Brumley v. . BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Brumley v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- William G. Libby v. L.J. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Morrissey v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- James M. Morrissey, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants v. Martin Segal and Leon Karchmer, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees, Joseph CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Hodnett v. Monroe City School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Tucker Ex Rel. Local 70 Bartender's Union of Brooklyn & Queens v. ShawDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1970
- Morrissey v. CurranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.