Hart v. Hart

The issue in this case is as to how the net income from a testamentary trust created by the last will of Albert E. Hart, deceased, shall be divided between the two beneficiaries, Hazel Carton, appellant, who is the daughter of the decedent, and Maude E. Hart Mazur, appellee (formerly Maude E. Hart), decedent’s widow and stepmother of appellant.

The controversy involves that portion of the will which reads:

“After all my just debts are paid I want all my property put in trust for the benefit of my heirs as hereafter stated. My wife Maude E. Hart is to have the entire net income, If she lives…