Legal Opinion

Hartt v. Harris Trust & Savings Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 22, 1967No. Gen. 50,284PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE ENGLISH

delivered the opinion of the court.

From a judgment denying her petition for distribution of $8,000 or more, which she alleges is intestate property from the estate of Jay Samuel Hartt, plaintiff appeals, contending that since decedent’s will contained no provisions directing or authorizing the accumulation of unexpended or undistributed property and because his widow renounced her share, plaintiff, as sole remaining heir-at-law, is entitled to the intestate property.

On April 13, 1962, Jay Samuel Hartt died testate, leaving as his sole heirs-at-law his widow,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cahill v. MichaelIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Walker v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Golstein v. HandleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Glaser v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Strauss v. StraussIllinois Supreme Court · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. WilmotAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  2. Canal National Bank v. NoyesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  3. Corn Belt Bank v. HankinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API