Legal Opinion

Texaco, Inc. v. Village of Schaumburg

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 19, 1985No. 84—1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE BUCKLEY

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, Texaco, Inc., filed a complaint seeking a declaration that the defendant village of Schaumburg’s zoning ordinance was unconstitutional and void to the extent it prohibited redevelopment of plaintiff’s property, currently used as a gasoline station, as a combination gasoline station, food-mart and car wash. Following a bench trial, the trial court ruled that the zoning ordinance was unconstitutional and void with respect to part of plaintiff’s proposed plan, but not with respect to the remainder. Plaintiff appeals and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sinclair Pipe Line Co. v. Village of Richton ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Schultz v. Village of LisleIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Harshman v. City of DeKalbAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. Norwood Builders v. City of Des PlainesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. National Boulevard Bank v. Village of SchaumburgIllinois Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seiler v. City of Granite CityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. KRR Investments, LLC v. County of GrundyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API