Legal Opinion

National Boulevard Bank v. Village of Schaumburg

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1980No. 52670PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kluczynski

Plaintiff Eugene Matanky is the beneficial owner of property held in trust by plaintiff National Boulevard Bank of Chicago. Plaintiffs instituted this declaratory judgment action subsequent to a denial by defendant, the village of Schaumburg, of Matanky’s request to rezone the subject property. The circuit court ruled that plaintiffs had overcome the presumption of validity of the village’s zoning ordinance as applied to the subject property, and the court also found that plaintiffs’ proposed use, a combination of multifamily and single-family uses, was reasonable. The appellate court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schultz v. Village of LisleIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Bauske v. City of Des PlainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Aurora National Bank v. City of AuroraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. National Boulevard Bank v. Village of SchaumburgAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cosmopolitan National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. American National Bank & Trust Co. v. Village of Arlington HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Texaco, Inc. v. Village of SchaumburgAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. City of Elgin v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. City of Elgin v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API