Legal Opinion
Arthur David Talbot v. Honorable J. L. McCarrey Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 20, 1955No. 14490PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to prohibit respondent Judge of the District Court for the District of Alaska, Third Division, hereafter the respondent, from taking any further steps in a criminal contempt proceeding against petitioner and a writ of mandamus to compel respondent to vacate an order requiring petitioner to appear and be heard why he should not be held in contempt for perjury.
The proceeding began by an order to petitioner to show cause before the District Court as follows:
“It is hereby ordered that Arthur David Talbot appear before me on Friday, July…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Ex Parte HudgingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- In Re MichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Moses LewisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- United States v. TalbotDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1955
- Vickers Associates, Ltd. v. Urice (In Re Jaritz Industries, Ltd.)District Court, Virgin Islands · 1997
- Rogers v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Vickers Associates, Ltd. v. UriceDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.