Legal Opinion
United States v. Talbot
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided June 23, 1955No. Cr. 3050PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCARREY, District Judge.
This is a criminal contempt proceeding brought summarily under rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A., based upon a motion and order to show cause, made by the U. S. District Attorney, why the defendant, Arthur David Talbot, should not be held in contempt of court for making a perjured statement while sworn as a witness in the trial of the case—United States v. Stringer, No. A-9150, D.C., 124 F.Supp. 705—then pending before the court.
A hearing was had on the order to show cause, and before this court had an opportunity to determine the issues…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Michaelson v. United States Ex Rel. Chicago, St. P., M. & OR Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ex Parte HudgingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Miller v. Mayer (In Re Miller)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1988
- United States Lines, Inc. v. GAC Marine Fuels Ltd. (In Re McLean Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Beckley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re L.H. & A. Realty, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.