Margaret J. Randall v. Edwin Meese, Iii, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1DissentMikva, Circuit Judge
Appellant Randall would, I am convinced, have obtained the status adjustment she seeks but for a government official’s unconstitutional action. The record indicates that the district director ruled that she was statutorily eligible for a status adjustment, but decided that he would not grant it because he disapproved of her writings and associations. The majority holds that Randall’s claim is not ripe and that she must pursue her claim at a later time in other courts. But it minimizes the crucial importance of the citizenship right at stake. As the Supreme Court has noted, “[a] person…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. RobelSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.