Legal Opinion

Russell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1973No. Docket 12884PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTargonski, J.

This appeal arises from the purchase of certain insurance policies.

The plaintiff obtained a policy of automobile insurance from the appellee on April 3, 1965 covering his 1964 Pontiac automobile. This coverage remained in effect until May 31, 1967. This policy, included among other coverages, medical payment coverage for the insured and his family. This policy did not contain a subrogation clause since the plaintiff specifically requested that he did not want such a provision included in this policy.

In March of 1966, the defendant began issuing policies of insurance containing subrogation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aurora Fire & Marine Insurance v. KranichMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Attorney General Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. Lapeer Farmers Mutual Fire Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Burch v. WargoMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Scanlon v. Western Fire InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Naparstek v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Royal Property Group, LLC v. Prime Insurance Syndicate, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Parmet Homes, Inc. v. Republic InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Industro Motive Corp. v. Morris Agency, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. SheffieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. Usher v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API