Legal Opinion

Kavanau Real Estate Trust v. Debnam

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1980No. 89PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Four issues have been presented for our consideration.

First, defendants complain that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that G.S. 45-21.38 (the anti-deficiency statute) does not bar an in personam suit and judgment on a purchase money note securing an assignment of a leasehold interest. The Court of Appeals so held because the anti-deficiency statute bars a suit for a deficiency judgment after foreclosure and bars suit on the note in lieu of foreclosure, Ross Realty Co. v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co., 296 N.C. 366, 250 S.E. 2d 271 (1979), in “sales of real property…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sink v. EasterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Ross Realty Co. v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Bowen v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Burwell v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Matter of GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Byrd v. ArrowoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Fleet National Bank v. Raleigh Oaks Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. City of Elizabeth City v. LFM Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. City of Statesville v. Credit & Loan Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API