Legal Opinion

Fleet National Bank v. Raleigh Oaks Joint Venture

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1994No. 9310SC1276PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

Vogel argues that he cannot be held liable for the deficiency after the foreclosure sale because he was not personally served with notice of the foreclosure hearing. The record reveals that the trustee attempted personal service on Vogel by mailing notice of the hearing by certified mail to the address specified by Vogel in the deed of trust. This attempt at service failed because Vogel had moved to Florida. *389The trustee also mailed notice by certified mail to ROJV “c/o Seymour Vogel” at ROJV’s Raleigh address. This notice was accepted by one of ROJV’s agents. The trustee…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Turner v. BlackburnDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1975
  2. In Re the Foreclosure of a Certain Deed of Trust From WattsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. In Re Foreclosure of Sutton Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Kavanau Real Estate Trust v. DebnamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. LackeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adams v. Bank United of Texas, FSBCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Hometrust Bank v. GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Fleet National Bank v. Raleigh Oaks Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. HomeTrust Bank v. TsirosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. Karen Wynkoop v. Gerard StratthausSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API