State v. Lynch
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Defendant brings forward five assignments of error. Defendant’s first three assignments of error are directed to the admission into evidence of the marijuana seized from his person. Defendant contends that the evidence was inadmissible because (i) the initial stop of defendant’s vehicle was unconstitutional, (ii) defendant’s arrest was unconstitutional, and (iii) the search of defendant’s person and the seizure were unconstitutional in that they were the products of the illegal detention. Defendant’s fourth assignment of error is that the trial court erred in denying his motion…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hill v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. SwiftCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Bell v. DawsonDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2001
- State v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.