Shade v. Wright
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant, Stuart N. Wright, Jr., appeals as of right an order granting the motion by plaintiff, Carolyn Shade, to modify parenting time with the parties’ minor child.1 For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we affirm.
I. RELEVANT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The parties were married in December 1993; they had one child during the marriage. Plaintiff filed for divorce in September 2005. The parties agreed on a custody and parenting time arrangement that, in part, allowed plaintiff to move with the minor child from Midland, Michigan, to Ohio, and also established a parenting time schedule.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grievance Administrator v. LopatinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- CAF Investment Co. v. Saginaw TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Ashker v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Pierron v. PierronMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Hoffman v. HoffmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by44 opinions
- Rains v. RainsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Kubicki v. SharpeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- KBD & Associates, Inc. v. Great Lakes Foam Technologies, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Sturgis v. SturgisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Gaudreau v. KellyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.