Legal Opinion

Sturgis v. Sturgis

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 2013No. Docket No. 313672PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Flaintiff appeals the trial court’s ruling on defendant’s motion for a change in custody. Flaintiff specifically challenges the trial court’s failure to hold a de novo hearing on her motion for termination of defendant’s parental rights and the trial court’s order reinstating defendant’s parenting time. For the reasons set forth, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

Flaintiff argues that the trial court erred by denying her a de novo hearing on the subject of her termination motion. “Whether there is a statutory requirement for a hearing de novo ... is a question of law calling for *708review de…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shade v. WrightMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Heindlmeyer v. Ottawa County Concealed Weapons Licensing BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Cochrane v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of Chance Aaron Nash v. City of Grand HavenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Amber Elizabeth Adams v. Stephen Charles Adams IIMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Estate of Chance Aaron Nash v. City of Grand HavenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. He Zhang v. Xi LiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Patricia Labarre v. Robert S LabarreMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API