Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. Dixon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 22, 1933No. 9034PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLX, Chief Justice.

This is a suit instituted by appellee for commissions alleged to have been earned by appellee for procuring the sale of certain land in Mexico, belonging to appellant, on which the fees for selling the land were $5,500, of which appellee claimed one-third, amounting to $1,833.33. It was answered that appellant owed a commission to a partnership consisting of A. M. Wormser, W. P. Wickline, and appellee, and was ready to pay the commission agreed upon, of 2½ per cent., and tendered into court an order upon G. C. Walker, to whom appellant had been instructed to pay it. One L.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. DuncanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Irvine v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Sabine Tram Co. v. T. Bancroft & SonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. McFaddin, Wiess & Kyle Land Co. v. Texas Rice Land Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Senneff v. HealySupreme Court of Iowa · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cockburn v. IrvinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Strack v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Dixon v. SanchezTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Sanchez v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Cockburn v. IrvinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API