Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Sanchez

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1936No. 6572PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge HICKMAN

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

Hugh E. Dixon sued Leopoldo Sanchez for commissions claimed to have been earned by him in procuring the sale of certain lands belonging to Sanchez situated in the Republic of Mexico. Sanchez filed an answer to the petition consisting of a special exception and certain special pleas. No general denial was interposed. In his answer he acknowledged that he owed a commission on the transaction, but was in doubt as to whether Dixon was entitled to any interest therein. Accordingly, he impleaded W. P. Wickline and A. W.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Royal Neighbors of America v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Graham Refining Co. v. Graham Oil SyndicateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Sanchez v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marek v. Southern Enterprises Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Lowrimore v. SandersTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Marek v. Southern Enterprises, Inc., of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1936
  4. Lowrimore v. SandersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1937
  5. Sanchez v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API