Legal Opinion

Littlefield v. Nelson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 31, 1957No. 5540PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellee invoked the diversity jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma by instituting this action to quiet title to certain lands bordering the Arkansas River on the south in LeFlore County, Oklahoma. The subject lands are contiguous to lands admittedly owned by plaintiff but stand unrepresented by record of title except as plaintiff claims by accretion and appellants-defendants assert possessory rights. The defendants do not seek affirmative relief but are aggrieved by the trial court’s decree establishing the lands…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. County of St. Clair v. LovingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Weems Steamboat Co. of Baltimore v. People's Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Frank v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Carpenter v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Goins v. MerrymanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brainard v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  3. The Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations v. Myrtle Cox, the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations v. Joe Crain and Roxie CrainCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  4. Lear Petroleum Corp. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  5. Littlefield v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API