The Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations v. Myrtle Cox, the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations v. Joe Crain and Roxie Crain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
The trial and appeal of these two cases were consolidated as involving the same question of law and fact. In each action the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations seek an adjudicated title to certain lands situated in Bryan County, Oklahoma, and accreted on the north bank of the Red River. The trial court found as a fact that appellees’ record title, founded upon grants from the appellant Indian Nation, described riparian lands bounded by the Red River and that the Indian Nations had no valid claim to the accreted lands. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
For many decades prior…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Braddock v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- L. G. Herron v. Choctaw and Chickasaw NationsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Littlefield v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Stone v. McFarlinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Bradham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
3Cited by6 opinions
- Victor Fontenelle v. Omaha Tribe of Nebraska, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Bear v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1985
- Pasotex Petroleum Company, a Corporation v. M.B. CameronCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Snake River Ranch, a General Partnership v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Fontenelle v. Omaha Tribe of NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.