Legal Opinion

Throesch v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided February 10, 2000No. 3:98CV00462 WRWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WILSON, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 26), and Plaintiffs Response (Doc. No. 35). Telephone conferences regarding the issues discussed below were held on January 5, 2000, and January 10, 2000. The Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

I. Background

On August 26, 1997, plaintiff was traveling on U.S. Highway 67 when another vehicle allegedly crossed the center line into her lane. In order to miss the other vehicle, plaintiff drove off the shoulder of the road and lost control of her vehicle, which overturned and rolled,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ester v. National Home Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. NovakWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Lyons v. Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Su v. Kemper Insurance Companies/American Motorists InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  5. McLane Co., Inc. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API