Legal Opinion

Lyons v. Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 19, 1990No. 89-318PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This case involves the procedural question of whether the appellant properly made service of summons and complaint on the appellee, a domestic corporation. Appellant filed a products liability suit against appellee Forrest City Machine Works (F. C. Machine Works). The summons in question was addressed to F. C. Machine Works, and the return shows that F. C. Machine Works was served as the person being named as the defendant, on February 17, 1986. The trial court granted the appellee’s motion to dismiss on the basis that service in the case was not valid, and appellant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. St. Clair v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. May v. Bob Hankins Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Hirsch v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  5. Emerson v. BridgforthCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Smith v. Sidney Moncrief Pontiac, Buick, GMC Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. State v. SypultSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Raymond v. RaymondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc. v. LyonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Green v. WigginsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API