Krone v. AMI, INC.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HENLEY, Chief Judge.
This personal injury suit is now before the Court on the motion of the defendant, AMI, Inc., to quash service of summons. The motion is actually one to dismiss the complaint for lack of in per-sonam jurisdiction with respect to the defendant. The motion, opposed by plaintiff, has been submitted on the complaint, the motion, memorandum briefs in support of and in opposition to the motion, and a stipulation of facts.
Plaintiff is a citizen of Arkansas. Defendant is a Louisiana corporation which holds a franchise authorizing it to operate a Holiday Inn in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Vance M. Thompson. Jr. William Hadley Thompson W. Dane Clay W. Dane Clay, Trustee and R. Mike Butner v. Ecological Science CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Pennsalt Chemical Corp. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mary Marino and Thomas Marino v. Hyatt CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Freddie Pauline Pearrow v. National Life and Accident Insurance Company, D/B/A Opryland USACourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Martin v. Kelley Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1974
- Banton v. Opryland U.S.A. Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Slocum v. Sandestin Beach Resort HotelDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.