Legal Opinion
Slocum v. Sandestin Beach Resort Hotel
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided February 25, 1988No. LR-C-87-543PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HENRY WOODS, District Judge.
Separate defendants Sandestin Beach Resort Hotel, a division of Beachside # 1 Condo Association, and Beachside # 1 Condo Association have submitted the pending joint motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b). Because the exercise of in personam jurisdiction by this Court over these defendants would be violative of Ark. Stat.Ann. § 27-2502 (Repl.1977), now codified at Ark.Code Ann. § 16-4-101 (1987), and the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution, we grant their motion to dismiss.
The facts in the case at bar are relatively…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Moki Mac River Expeditions v. DruggTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Wims v. Beach Terrace Motor Inn, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Jenson v. R.L.K. & Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Jensen v. RLK & CO.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Moki Mac River Expeditions v. DruggTexas Supreme Court · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.