Legal Opinion

Sipes v. Crum

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1970No. 45,535PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harman, C.;

This is an action for reformation of a contract of sale of a beauty salon. Appeal is from the trial court’s order sustaining defendant’s motion for directed verdict made at the conclusion of plaintiffs’ evidence.

Plaintiffs Jean Keck Sipes and June Keck Rice commenced the action by filing their petition March 12, 1965, naming as defendants Edwin E. Crum, his wife, Lucille S. Crum, and Heckel Bros., Inc., a corporation engaged in the wholesale beauty supply business. Plaintiffs alleged that on January 2, 1962, they entered into a written…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Paul v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  2. Hoch v. HochSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. Todd v. Wichita Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Anne P. Henry v. Office of Thrift SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. DuShane v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Fox v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Fisher v. Mr. Harold's Hair Lab, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. People v. DreasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API