Legal Opinion

People v. Dreas

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1984No. AO18063PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*627Opinion

CALDECOTT, P. J.

The principal issue presented on this appeal is whether the administering of drugs to overcome the victim’s resistance can constitute the element of force within the meaning of Penal Code section 211.1

Saban Dreas appeals from a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of three counts of robbery, three counts of administering drugs with intent to commit a felony (§ 222), three counts of burglary and two counts of auto theft.

The facts in each of the three instances are basically the same. Appellant would patronize a bar, strike up a conversation with the victim, a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. People v. IrelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. ForsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Delligatti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
  3. People v. Burrell-HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. People v. PicenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API