City of Fairmont v. Pitrolo Pontiac-Cadillac Co.
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Justice:
The issues in this certified case arose when the City of Fairmont filed suit against Pitrolo Pontiac-Cadillac and Acme Land Company to collect delinquent fire service fees. The defendants sought to defeat the collection by claiming that the City fire service charge was an ad valorem tax and violated the provisions of Section 1 of Article X of the Constitution of West Virginia. While this case was pending in the circuit court, we issued our opinion in Hare v. City of Wheeling, 171 W.Va. 284, 298 S.E.2d 820 (1982), where we said in its single Syllabus:
“Where certain ordinances…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Bradley v. Appalachian Power Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- Dawson v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. ReeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Emerson College v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- United States v. City of Huntington, West VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.