Legal Opinion

Banks v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 2, 2003No. Nos. 01-5150 to 01-5185PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINN, Circuit Judge.

John H. and Mary E. Banks, along with thirty-five other plaintiffs, seek review of final decisions of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing their individual complaints as barred by the statute of hmitations. See Banks et al. v. United States, 49 Fed.Cl. 806 (2001). Because the plaintiffs’ claims did not accrue more than six years before their filings, this court *1306reverses and remands for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

The thirty-six plaintiffs own property in Michigan along a four and one-half mile stretch of the eastern shoreline of Lake Michigan south of St.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Boling v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  4. Fallini v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Don Applegate and Gayle Applegate (For Themselves and a Class of Others Similarly Situated, Totalling 271) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. John R. Sand & Gravel Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Barron Bancshares, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Barron Bancshares, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  4. Arakaki v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Henderson County Drainage District No. 3 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API