Legal Opinion

Fife v. Jayne

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 5, 1943No. 33,327PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loking, Justice.

This is an appeal by the heirs of Estella Simmons, deceased, from an order denying their motion for a new trial. The propriety of the allowance of the administrator’s compensation and attor*390neys’ fees is involved. The probate court approved the second intermediate account of the administrators of the estate allowing Lawrence Jayne $60,000 for his services as administrator and the firm of Johnson, Sands & Brumfield $25,000 as attorneys for the administrators. The heirs appealed from this order to the district court, which made findings that the allowances were reasonable and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. King v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Hagerty v. WorkWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. In re the Estate of GallowayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  4. Williams v. JayneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. In Re Estate of MarchildonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. In Re Estate of BaumgartnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Jacobson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Angelos v. BalafasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. In Re Estate of SimmonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API