Legal Opinion
In re AndroGel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided October 30, 2012No. MDL Docket No. 2084; No. 1:09-MD-2084-TWTPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER
THOMAS W. THRASH, JR., District Judge.
This is a multidistrict litigation proceeding involving antitrust actions that are consolidated for pretrial proceedings. It is before the Court on Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc. and Paddock Laboratories, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Objective Baselessness [Doc. 555]1, Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc. and Paddock Laboratories, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Improper Subjective Motivation [Doc. 567], Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc. and Paddock Laboratories, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment on…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Niazi Licensing Corporation v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020