Legal Opinion
Alfred Hale Rubber Co. v. Morse & Burt Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 5, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks in this action to restrain the alleged infringement by the defendants of patent No. 1,479,497, issued by the United States Patent Office to David A. Cutler, dated January 1, 1924, and to recover damages. The defendants have interposed the answer of invalidity and noninfringement.
No evidence of any sort has been presented that in any way connects the defendant Cantilever Shoe Shop, Inc., with the alleged infringement; therefore the complaint should be dismissed as to them, with costs.
The patent in suit is for the process of attaching rubber soles to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Clark Thread Co. v. Willimantic Linen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Franc-Strohmenger & Cowan, Inc. v. Arthur Siegman, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1928
- Shattuck v. KijakaziDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2022
- United States v. Aegis Sec. Ins. Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2025