Legal Opinion

Akers v. Mathieson Alkali Works

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 20, 1928PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWest, J.

E. C. Akers, complainant, is the owner of seventeen acres of land in the town of Saltville, Smyth county, Virginia. This land has upon it three dwelling houses and outbuildings, and is nearly surrounded by the lands of the Mathieson Alkali Works, the defendant. The Akers land is very rugged and hilly, except a few acres upon which the buildings are located. There is an opening in the side of the hill east of the buildings from which, during and after rains, clear water formerly flowed. It was, more accurately speaking, a wet weather spring.

The defendant’s tract of land contains several…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. SandersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Gorham v. GrossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. Clifton Iron Co. v. DyeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Weaver Mercantile Co. v. ThurmondWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Day v. Louisville Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Cooper v. HornSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  2. Levisa Coal Co. v. Consolidation Coal Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  3. Fancher v. FagellaSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  4. Stuart v. Lake Washington Realty CorporationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Springer v. GaddySupreme Court of Virginia · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API