Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Armstrong

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 1947No. Civ. No. 15624PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

Reference is hereby made to the companion case, Civil No. 15738, (ante, p. 316 [183 P.2d 901]) wherein the plaintiff Ruth K. Armstrong appealed from an order setting aside an interlocutory judgment of divorce, and a further order denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate the first order, for a knowledge of such facts as are not fully stated herein.

The material facts directly involved in the present appeal may be summarized as follows: On August 14, 1945, the respondent wife was granted an interlocutory judgment of divorce from the appellant husband who had been personally served with summons; this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Nelson v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Borenstein v. BorensteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Wittman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Storke v. StorkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Falcone v. FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Nacht v. NachtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Greenwell v. CaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Loke v. LokeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API