Storke v. Storke
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County, awarding alimony and counsel fees, and from an order directing the payment of a sum of money to enable the plaintiff to prosecute the action. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
The plaintiff brought this action against her husband, the defendant, for permanent support and maintenance under section 137 of the Civil Code; and on August 12, 1891, the trial court made an order that during the pendency of the action defendant pay plaintiff fifty dollars per month alimony, and fifty dollars to her attorney. From this order, on the day on which it was made, defendant appealed. Appellant had filed an answer averring the insanity of plaintiff and praying for the appointment of a guardian ad litem for her; and the point made by appellant is that the court had no right to…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Kowalsky v. KowalskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Holcomb v. HolcombWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- People ex rel. Smith v. District Court of Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.