Burlingame Motor Co. v. Peninsula Activities, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DEVINE, P. J.
Indemnity among tortfeasors is the subject of this appeal.
On May 5, 1961, Edward Bister, an employee of Dick Bullís, Inc., an automobile dealer, was injured by an explosion in the company’s paint shop. He was pumping gasoline from a drum. A moment before the explosion he heard a sound like that of two wires shortcircuiting each other. There were, in fact, as testified by the fire inspector, who investigated the accident, two bare hot wires close by. Bister sued Mausser Electric Company, Inc., Burlingame Motor Company, Inc. (hereinafter sometimes referred to as Burlingame…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Price v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Cahill Bros., Inc. v. Clementina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Goldman v. Ecco-Phoenix Electric Corp.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Vinnell Co. v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Niles v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Ferrell v. Southern Nevada Off-Road Enthusiasts, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Gonzales v. R. J. Novick Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Embrey v. Borough of West MifflinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.