Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Worley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 13, 1927No. 17642PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps-, J.

Evelyn Carroll, plaintiff in error, owned an oil and gas mining lease covering certain real estate located in Kay county. She entered into a contract with H. F. Worley, defendant in prror, by the terms of which she agreed to give him exclusive agency to procure and negotiate a drilling contract for the purpose of developing said lease, such agency to extend for a period of 60 days, and his compensation therefor to be a specified interest in the lease. Worley claimed to have procured a contract meeting all the requirements and to have presented it to plaintiff in error, who refused to accept…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Worley v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Daniels v. BunchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bell v. TackettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Harris v. BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Corbin v. BucySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. City of Fairview v. DerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Harness v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API