Legal Opinion

Sortito v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 16, 1928PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHhstman, J.

Each of the policies sued upon contained a “Preliminary Provision” that it shall not take effect if, on the date of the policy, the insured be not in sound health, although in such event the premiums paid, if any, shall be returned. The policies were dated October 4th, 1926. On October 7th the insured, Michael Sortito, had a hemorrhage, was found, upon examination by physicians, to be afflicted with pulmonary tuberculosis, and died therefrom on December 17th, 1926. The principal controversy, upon the trial, related to the issue as to whether the insured was in sound health at the date of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Chin LungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Hoxie v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864
  3. Hennessy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
  4. Vincent v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Asso.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  5. Benanti v. Delaware InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Glodenis v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. Salvatore v. HaydenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  4. Harty v. Eagle Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  5. Frager v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API