Martin v. National Surety Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Caedozo
A controversy is here as to the interests of rival claimants in moneys paid by the Government pursuant to a building contract, the one claim being founded on an assignment to a surety, which is held for the benefit of materialmen and laborers, the other on a power of attorney, later than the assignment, which was given to a creditor as security for a loan.
On February 12, 1932, a contract was made between the Government of the United States and Tobin, a builder, for the construction of a Post Office at Carlinville, Illinois. The statute called for a bond with a good and sufficient surety…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Freedman's Saving & Trust Co. v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Fourth Street Bank of Philadelphia v. YardleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Goodman v. NiblackSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- Segal v. RochelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- McKenzie v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.