Legal Opinion

Martin v. National Surety Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 29, 1937No. 500PublishedCited by 159 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Caedozo

A controversy is here as to the interests of rival claimants in moneys paid by the Government pursuant to a building contract, the one claim being founded on an assignment to a surety, which is held for the benefit of materialmen and laborers, the other on a power of attorney, later than the assignment, which was given to a creditor as security for a loan.

On February 12, 1932, a contract was made between the Government of the United States and Tobin, a builder, for the construction of a Post Office at Carlinville, Illinois. The statute called for a bond with a good and sufficient surety…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Freedman's Saving & Trust Co. v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Fourth Street Bank of Philadelphia v. YardleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Goodman v. NiblackSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by159 opinions

  1. Segal v. RochelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. McKenzie v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API